Protection against rat endotoxic shock by p55 tumor necrosis factor (TNF) receptor immunoadhesin: comparison with anti-TNF monoclonal antibody

H Jin, R Yang, SA Marsters, SA Bunting… - Journal of Infectious …, 1994 - academic.oup.com
H Jin, R Yang, SA Marsters, SA Bunting, FM Wurm, SM Chamow, A Ashkenazi
Journal of Infectious Diseases, 1994academic.oup.com
The protective efficacy of a p55 tumor necrosis factor receptor immunoadhesin (TNFR-IgG)
was compared with that of an anti-TNF monoclonal antibody (MAb) in a rat endotoxic shock
model. TNFR-IgG (5 mg/kg), given 30 min before endotoxin (LPS), attenuated LPS induction
of hypotension and tachycardia and eliminated LPS induction of serum TNF activity. In
contrast, anti-TNF MAb (5 rug/kg) had little effect on LPS-induced hemodynamic changes
and neutralized only partially the excessive serum TNF activity. The 6-day survival was 1 of …
Abstract
The protective efficacy of a p55 tumor necrosis factor receptor immunoadhesin (TNFR-IgG) was compared with that of an anti-TNF monoclonal antibody (MAb) in a rat endotoxic shock model. TNFR-IgG (5 mg/kg), given 30 min before endotoxin (LPS), attenuated LPS induction of hypotension and tachycardia and eliminated LPS induction of serum TNF activity. In contrast, anti-TNF MAb (5 rug/kg) had little effect on LPS-induced hemodynamic changes and neutralized only partially the excessive serum TNF activity. The 6-day survival was 1 of 10 controls; 6 of 11,5 of7, and 8 of9 rats receiving 0.2, 1.0, or 5.0 mg/kg TNFR-IgG, respectively; and 3 of 8 rats receiving 5 rug/kg anti-TNF MAb. These results indicate that TNFR-IgG is more potent than anti-TNF MAb at neutralizing excessive TNF activity in vivo.
Oxford University Press